Re: [coreboot] failover only for s2895

[Myles Watson]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:46 AM, ron minnich  wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Myles Watson wrote:
> > I had always misunderstood failover.  I thought it was the last resort if
> > normal & fallback didn't work.  It actually is just a minimal image that
> > chooses whether to run normal or fallback.
>
> that's why I never liked the name :-)
> It's confusing.

One of these days we'll have to change the name of cache_as_ram_auto.c and
failover.c at the same time.
> Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich

Rev 4427.

Thanks,
Myles