On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:46 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Myles Watson<mylesgw@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had always misunderstood failover. I thought it was the last resort if
> normal & fallback didn't work. It actually is just a minimal image that
> chooses whether to run normal or fallback.

that's why I never liked the name :-)
It's confusing.

One of these days we'll have to change the name of cache_as_ram_auto.c and failover.c at the same time.

Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminich@gmail.com>