Re: [coreboot] get_fx_devs

[Myles Watson]

Something I noticed after I sent the patch is that this code (with or
without my patch) depends on the pointers being initialized to zero.  Is
that a valid assumption with gcc?

Thanks,
Myles

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> get_fx_devs() was called very few places, and it wasn't needed except the
> first call.  I combined them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson
>
> Thanks,
> Myles