Something I noticed after I sent the patch is that this code (with or without my patch) depends on the pointers being initialized to zero. Is that a valid assumption with gcc?
Thanks, Myles
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com> wrote:
get_fx_devs() was called very few places, and it wasn't needed except the first call. I combined them.