[patch] fix fam10 stack size

[Marc Jones]

Adjust the FAM10 stack size to match newconfig.

Signed-off-by: Marc Jones

[ron minnich]

Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich

[Myles Watson]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: coreboot-bounces+mylesgw=[e-mail] [mailto:coreboot-
> bounces+mylesgw=[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Marc Jones
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 5:05 PM
> To: Coreboot
> Subject: [coreboot] [patch] fix fam10 stack size
>
> Adjust the FAM10 stack size to match newconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Jones

I'm not sure it was right in newconfig.  Doesn't it have to be larger than
that (8K)?  I thought it had to be 32K for lzma.  The other reason for the
stack being larger is page tables for memory initialization, right?

Thanks,
Myles

[ron minnich]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> I'm not sure it was right in newconfig.  Doesn't it have to be larger than
> that (8K)?  I thought it had to be 32K for lzma.  The other reason for the
> stack being larger is page tables for memory initialization, right?

I thought marc was fixing the AP stack size.

I may have misunderstood.

ron

[Marc Jones]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, ron minnich  wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> > I'm not sure it was right in newconfig.  Doesn't it have to be larger than
> > that (8K)?  I thought it had to be 32K for lzma.  The other reason for the
> > stack being larger is page tables for memory initialization, right?
>
> I thought marc was fixing the AP stack size.
>
> I may have misunderstood.

I didn't realize that lzma required 32k. I was trying to resolve a
problem Zheng brought up about AP stacks. We'll keep working on it.

Marc