Our current ROM naming scheme in buildrom is <vendor>-<platform>.rom. This is all nice and good, but for archiving (or rom-o-matic) purposes, we need to be more descriptive. Therefore, I propose that we move to the more unwieldly, but also more descriptive:
<vendor>-<platform>-cbv[23]-<payload>.rom
Thoughts?
Jordan
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Jordan Crouse jordan.crouse@amd.com wrote:
Our current ROM naming scheme in buildrom is <vendor>-<platform>.rom. This is all nice and good, but for archiving (or rom-o-matic) purposes, we need to be more descriptive. Therefore, I propose that we move to the more unwieldly, but also more descriptive:
<vendor>-<platform>-cbv[23]-<payload>.rom
excellent idea!
ron
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:55:14PM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
Our current ROM naming scheme in buildrom is <vendor>-<platform>.rom. This is all nice and good, but for archiving (or rom-o-matic) purposes, we need to be more descriptive. Therefore, I propose that we move to the more unwieldly, but also more descriptive:
<vendor>-<platform>-cbv[23]-<payload>.rom
Thoughts?
Great. I'd be happy to see a date/timestamp in there too.
Thanks, Ward.
Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:55:14PM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
Our current ROM naming scheme in buildrom is <vendor>-<platform>.rom. This is all nice and good, but for archiving (or rom-o-matic) purposes, we need to be more descriptive. Therefore, I propose that we move to the more unwieldly, but also more descriptive:
<vendor>-<platform>-cbv[23]-<payload>.rom
Thoughts?
Great. I'd be happy to see a date/timestamp in there too.
That would make the string really long. I think the revision is more relevant. A build date should follow the file date/time. I know that can get lost but....
I guess that the reason you want time/date is for builds that use local files and are not a svn co r###. What about replace the cbv[###] with the time/date or other user string on local builds?
More thoughts? Marc
Jordan Crouse wrote:
<vendor>-<platform>-cbv[23]-<payload>.rom
Maybe without 'v' ?
Don't mind me. I don't use buildrom that much.
On that topic - could we please remove or rename util/buildrom?
//Peter