Re: [coreboot] RFC: coding style: "standard" defines

[Patrick Georgi]

2016-02-04 10:35 GMT+01:00 Patrick Georgi :
> during the review of some commits that are in the process of being
> upstreamed from Chrome OS, people noticed that chipset drivers like to
> define their own TRUE/FALSE defines (sometimes prefixed to), and I
> have seen a bunch of #define BIT{0-31} ..., too, because that seems to
> be the house rules in some firmware communities.

Seems like for the BIT defines, all variants are popular. Any
objection with moving them to src/include instead of having various
copies across the tree?

Patrick