RE: [LinuxBIOS] Re: topics for linuxbios summit

[Lu, Yinghai]

Did you notice that our list can not searched by google now?

YH

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Reinauer [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wed 9/7/2005 1:30 AM
To: Eric W. Biederman; [e-mail]; Lu, Yinghai
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Re: topics for linuxbios summit

* yhlu  [050907 06:04]:
> > Before we generate ACPI or anything else we need to move the relevant
> > information
> > into the internal device tree.
>
> YH: Good point, But I worry that we make LinuxBIOS more complicated.

No, the information has to be reorganized. Currently pirq and mptables
have to be hand crafted, and this is the complicated thing. Instead the
abstract information should be put to the configuration filess, if it 
can not be probed.
> 11. LinuxBIOS Maintenance.  How can we do better?
>
> YH:  I agree we need
>          b. move back the list and public source tree to US.

what's wrong with the status quo?

Stefan

[LinuxBIOS] Re: topics for linuxbios summit

[Stefan Reinauer]

* Lu, Yinghai  [050907 17:51]:
> Did you notice that our list can not searched by google now?

Actually no. It works fine here.. For example:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22BIOS+Saver+RD1%22

Google indeed prefers .org over .de domains, but that is no problem
since the nameserver entry is linuxbios.org not linuxbios.de.

Regards,
   Stefan