[patch]: Remove src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h

[Bao, Zheng]

Remove src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h, which is not used any more.

No attached patches to reduce confusing.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao

[Bao, Zheng]

BTW, I tried to use the following way to create patch.
1. svn delete src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h
2. svn diff > remove.patch
But when I tried to apply the patch, it just makes the mct.h empty
instead of deleting it.

How to create a patch in this case?

Zheng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: coreboot-bounces+zheng.bao=[e-mail]

[mailto:coreboot-
> bounces+zheng.bao=[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Bao, Zheng
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:37 AM
> To: Coreboot
> Subject: [coreboot] [patch]: Remove

src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h
> Remove src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h, which is not used any

more.
> No attached patches to reduce confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao

[Warren Turkal]

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Bao, Zheng  wrote:
> BTW, I tried to use the following way to create patch.
> svn delete src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h
> svn diff > remove.patch
>
> But when I tried to apply the patch, it just makes the mct.h empty
> instead of deleting it.
>
> How to create a patch in this case?

How did you apply the patch?

See the -E option of patch(1) for more info.

wt

[Uwe Hermann]

On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:37:22AM +0800, Bao, Zheng wrote:
> Remove src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h, which is not used any more.
>
> No attached patches to reduce confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao

Looks like that file was never used or #included at all, indeed. But
what is the difference to mct_d.h (which _is_ used)? The latter is
pretty similar to mct.h, but not quite the same. What does the "_d"
suffix stand for? Can mct.h be safely removed and is it not needed later?

If yes:

Acked-by: Uwe Hermann

Uwe.

[Scott Duplichan]

]> Remove src/northbridge/amd/amdmct/mct/mct.h, which is not used any more.
]> 
]> No attached patches to reduce confusing.
]> 
]> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao 
]
]Looks like that file was never used or #included at all, indeed. But
]what is the difference to mct_d.h (which _is_ used)? The latter is
]pretty similar to mct.h, but not quite the same. What does the "_d"
]suffix stand for? Can mct.h be safely removed and is it not needed later?

The suffix "_d" is for Deerhound, a family10 processor. I believe the agesa
team originally added _d to files to distinguish between files for family 0Fh
and filers for family 10h. A newer naming convention embeds into the file 
name characters such as F10, F12, or 0x10, x12.

Thanks,
Scott

]If yes:
]
]Acked-by: Uwe Hermann 
]
] 
]Uwe.
]-- 
]http://hermann-uwe.de     | http://sigrok.org
]http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org