patch: more generic mainboard name

[ron minnich]

since there's only one mainboard part:

This will break every target in the tree. Be careful what you wish
for. It might come true.

Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich

Index: util/newconfig/config.g
===================================================================
--- util/newconfig/config.g	(revision 3944)
+++ util/newconfig/config.g	(working copy)
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@
    fulldir = os.path.join(srcdir, partdir)
    type_name = flatten_name(partdir)
    newpart = partobj(curimage, fulldir, partstack.tos(), 'mainboard', \
-		type_name, 0, 'chip')
+		'mainboard', 0, 'chip')
    #print "Configuring PART %s" % (type)
    partstack.push(newpart)
    #print "  new PART tos is now %s\n" %partstack.tos().info()

[Myles Watson]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, ron minnich  wrote:
> since there's only one mainboard part:
>
> This will break every target in the tree. Be careful what you wish
> for. It might come true.

With this patch from Carl-Daniel:

http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-February/044903.html

It passes abuild.  I think they should be committed together.
> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich

Both patches
Acked-by: Myles Watson

Thanks,
Myles
> Index: util/newconfig/config.g
>
> --- util/newconfig/config.g     (revision 3944)
> +++ util/newconfig/config.g     (working copy)
> @@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@
>        fulldir = os.path.join(srcdir, partdir)
>        type_name = flatten_name(partdir)
>        newpart = partobj(curimage, fulldir, partstack.tos(), 'mainboard', \
>           type_name, 0, 'chip')
>           'mainboard', 0, 'chip')
>  #print "Configuring PART %s" % (type)
>  partstack.push(newpart)
>  #print "  new PART tos is now %s\n" %partstack.tos().info()

[ron minnich]

Go ahead and commit.

ron

[Myles Watson]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, ron minnich  wrote:
> > since there's only one mainboard part:
> >
> > This will break every target in the tree. Be careful what you wish
> > for. It might come true.
>
> With this patch from Carl-Daniel:
>
> http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-February/044903.html
>
> It passes abuild.  I think they should be committed together.
> > Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich
>
> Both patches
> Acked-by: Myles Watson

Rev 3954.

Thanks,
Myles

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 18.02.2009 21:42, Myles Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, ron minnich  wrote:
> > > since there's only one mainboard part:
> > >
> > > This will break every target in the tree. Be careful what you wish
> > > for. It might come true.
> >
> > With this patch from Carl-Daniel:
> >
> > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-February/044903.html
> >
> > It passes abuild.  I think they should be committed together.
> > > Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich
> >
> > Both patches
> > Acked-by: Myles Watson
>
> Rev 3954.

Awesome!

Thanks,
Carl-Daniel