Wonder if it's possible to set gmail's default reply to reply all. Anyways, forgotten again, but I'll add some extra info to make it worthwhile. Here's lspci -xxx from the vt8237r's lpc controller, on jetway j7f2w running ubuntu (I think):
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South] 00: 06 11 27 32 87 00 10 02 00 00 01 06 00 00 80 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 11 27 32 30: 00 00 00 00 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40: 44 c0 f8 0b 00 00 00 00 0c 20 00 00 04 00 0a 08 50: 80 99 09 00 00 00 00 00 62 80 00 08 00 00 00 00 60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 70: 06 11 27 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 80: 20 84 59 00 b2 30 00 00 01 04 00 00 06 18 00 00 90: 00 40 08 88 a0 c0 38 00 00 c1 20 00 00 00 00 00 a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0: 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d0: 01 05 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0: 00 00 00 00 00 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
On Feb 6, 2008 3:30 PM, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 3:17 PM, Luc Verhaegen libv@skynet.be wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:05:46PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:47:18PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
- dev = pci_dev_find(0x1106, 0x3227); /* VT8237 ISA bridge */
Is this really meant to be VT8237 or should it be VT8237R?
Hrm... Took the disk out already :( Chip itself is covered by a heatsink.
The machine i needed to flash the bios for has a VT8237A, and this has 0x3337 for the ISA bridge.
pciids.sf.net has the SP device down for a plain VT8237, confirms the VT8237A and has 0x3372 for VT8237S.
I'll guess i'll just give in and install a new suse for the p4m900 and return the other disk to its original owner (the SP).
Nope... lspci lists nothing VT8237Rish... Just plain VT8237.
Luc Verhaegen. SUSE/Novell X Driver Developer.
I'm looking at the datasheets and my own lspcis (I have removed the heatsink on one board), and 0x3227 is indeed the VT8237R/R Plus (not sure what the Plus adds, but I've got it). Via's website should also say, if you dig through the marketing garbage.
-Corey
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:42:44PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Wonder if it's possible to set gmail's default reply to reply all. Anyways, forgotten again, but I'll add some extra info to make it worthwhile. Here's lspci -xxx from the vt8237r's lpc controller, on jetway j7f2w running ubuntu (I think):
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South]
Well, i'm sure nobody will die from one message and a few comments not having an R in there :) pciids lack the R, so this sounded good enough.
VIA Marketing states +R, but i can tell you a nice story about the marketing names of unichromes, their retroactive evolution, and why i am now labelling unichromes/chromes as VT<pciid>.
Please change to +R, it seems like the best guess.
I am now wondering though what the actual, physical and tangible difference is between a VT8237 and a VT8237R.
Luc Verhaegen. SUSE/Novell X Driver Developer.
On 06.02.2008 21:54, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:42:44PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Wonder if it's possible to set gmail's default reply to reply all. Anyways, forgotten again, but I'll add some extra info to make it worthwhile. Here's lspci -xxx from the vt8237r's lpc controller, on jetway j7f2w running ubuntu (I think):
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South]
Well, i'm sure nobody will die from one message and a few comments not having an R in there :) pciids lack the R, so this sounded good enough.
VIA Marketing states +R, but i can tell you a nice story about the marketing names of unichromes, their retroactive evolution, and why i am now labelling unichromes/chromes as VT<pciid>.
Please change to +R, it seems like the best guess.
I am now wondering though what the actual, physical and tangible difference is between a VT8237 and a VT8237R.
What's the status of this patch?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
I'd say Acked-by: Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com
I don't really care what message gets put out there, hopefully board owners either know or don't care what they've got, and developers should be able to figure it out easy enough. These marketing names rarely make any sense anyways, but just my 2 cents.
-Corey
On Feb 8, 2008 6:28 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger < c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
On 06.02.2008 21:54, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:42:44PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Wonder if it's possible to set gmail's default reply to reply all.
Anyways,
forgotten again, but I'll add some extra info to make it worthwhile.
Here's
lspci -xxx from the vt8237r's lpc controller, on jetway j7f2w running
ubuntu
(I think):
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South]
Well, i'm sure nobody will die from one message and a few comments not having an R in there :) pciids lack the R, so this sounded good enough.
VIA Marketing states +R, but i can tell you a nice story about the marketing names of unichromes, their retroactive evolution, and why i am now labelling unichromes/chromes as VT<pciid>.
Please change to +R, it seems like the best guess.
I am now wondering though what the actual, physical and tangible difference is between a VT8237 and a VT8237R.
What's the status of this patch?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 09.02.2008 00:37, Corey Osgood wrote:
I'd say Acked-by: Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com
I don't really care what message gets put out there, hopefully board owners either know or don't care what they've got, and developers should be able to figure it out easy enough. These marketing names rarely make any sense anyways, but just my 2 cents.
Thanks, r3099.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Corey Osgood -
Luc Verhaegen