Re: Source code control

[Adam Megacz]

ron minnich  writes:
> darcs requires people to get a Haskell and build it. Not so sure I like 
> this.

We solved this problem by distributing statically linked binaries.
Not ideal, but generally workable.  Feel free to use them:

http://dist.xwt.org/darcs/
> In the end, what does arch do better than bitkeeper?

I think for many people (including me), BitMover's recent shenanigans
are more of a factor than the technical merits of their code.  But I
really don't want to start that argument here.  I do not claim that
darcs (or arch) has any features that BK lacks, except perhaps
simplicity.

- a