On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:08:37 AM ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mrnuke mr.nuke.me@gmail.com wrote:
That is a clear attempt to circumvent the
wishes of the rightsholders to this project.
That part I believe you are missing here is that this is a balancing act. The vendors are rightsholders too. They have knowledge we need. Unfortunately, most of them no longer want to release it -- it's not 1999. It's all well and good to say "well sod them then" but that's simply not an option on a large scale. I don't like it, you don't like it, we don't like it, ... but there it is.
$ git grep -i intel |grep -i copyright |grep -v microcode
Alex
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:15 AM, mrnuke mr.nuke.me@gmail.com wrote:
$ git grep -i intel |grep -i copyright |grep -v microcode
Point being?
ron
On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 12:15:35 PM mrnuke wrote:
On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:08:37 AM ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mrnuke mr.nuke.me@gmail.com wrote:
That is a clear attempt to circumvent the wishes of the rightsholders to this project.
That part I believe you are missing here is that this is a balancing act. The vendors are rightsholders too. They have knowledge we need. Unfortunately, most of them no longer want to release it -- it's not 1999. It's all well and good to say "well sod them then" but that's simply not an option on a large scale. I don't like it, you don't like it, we don't like it, ... but there it is.
$ git grep -i intel |grep -i copyright |grep -v microcode
and:
$ git log |grep -i author |grep -i intel
Alex