Fails to load module mtdchar.o (or atleast on my boxens with Gentoo) - Should probably load mtdchar at the time doc2001 & docprobe are loaded.
/dev/mtd0 should probably be named /dev/mtd/0 (or a if /dev/mtd0 not found, then /dev/mtd/0 ...depends if the person has deployed devfs or not.)
On 14 Aug 2003, Roger wrote:
Fails to load module mtdchar.o (or atleast on my boxens with Gentoo)
- Should probably load mtdchar at the time doc2001 & docprobe are
loaded.
yikes, that has not failed in years. I'll try to look.
/dev/mtd0 should probably be named /dev/mtd/0
only with devfs. OK, how do we cleanly work around the naming problem, given that devfs is living on borrowed time?
ron
ron minnich wrote: OK, how do we cleanly work around the naming problem,
given that devfs is living on borrowed time?
Oh great, just as I converted to devfs and got used to it.
-Steve
Something like the following should work fine. However, I find the simplicity of burn_mtd easy to understand and learn what needs to be done in order to successfully complete the linuxbios build. Adding more scripting will increase the time decoding the additional scripting to understand what actually needs to be done in order to complete the build. Maybe when builds become stable such as sis/amd, it would help to make enhance the scripting to account for these situations (ie something like autoconf/automake)
#! /bin/bash
if [ -e "/dev/mtd/0" ]; then echo 'hello' else echo 'bye' fi
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 20:02, ron minnich wrote:
On 14 Aug 2003, Roger wrote:
Fails to load module mtdchar.o (or atleast on my boxens with Gentoo)
- Should probably load mtdchar at the time doc2001 & docprobe are
loaded.
yikes, that has not failed in years. I'll try to look.
/dev/mtd0 should probably be named /dev/mtd/0
only with devfs. OK, how do we cleanly work around the naming problem, given that devfs is living on borrowed time?
ron
Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
well, if you rewrite it I will committ it.
ron
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 07:41, ron minnich wrote:
well, if you rewrite it I will committ it.
ron
Have yet to be able to get a successful linuxbios install on my 440bx chipsets. So this would be "putting the horse before the carriage" for me. :-/
On 15 Aug 2003, Roger wrote:
Have yet to be able to get a successful linuxbios install on my 440bx chipsets. So this would be "putting the horse before the carriage" for me. :-/
I'm off to vacation but will be happy to try to help when I get back in 10 days.
If anybody wants to take a shot at something new and fun, a port of a known-working-board to 2.0 would be very useful.
ron