[LinuxBIOS] Mobile Intel Celeron CPU Question

Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:

processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 11
model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
stepping	: 4
cpu MHz		: 731.076
cache size	: 256 KB
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 2
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat  
pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips	: 1445.88

What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right? Can this be  
combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.

Thanks - Joe

Quoting [e-mail]:
> Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
>
> processor	: 0
> vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> cpu family	: 6
> model		: 11
> model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> stepping	: 4
> cpu MHz		: 731.076
> cache size	: 256 KB
> fdiv_bug	: no
> hlt_bug		: no
> f00f_bug	: no
> coma_bug	: no
> fpu		: yes
> fpu_exception	: yes
> cpuid level	: 2
> wp		: yes
> flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
> pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> bogomips	: 1445.88
>
> What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right? Can this be
> combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.
>
> Thanks - Joe

Or possibly we can condense them into a model_6xxm (that's an m on the  
end for mobile)??

Thanks - Joe

[Corey Osgood]

[e-mail] wrote:
> Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
>
> processor	: 0
> vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> cpu family	: 6
> model		: 11
> model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> stepping	: 4
> cpu MHz		: 731.076
> cache size	: 256 KB
> fdiv_bug	: no
> hlt_bug		: no
> f00f_bug	: no
> coma_bug	: no
> fpu		: yes
> fpu_exception	: yes
> cpuid level	: 2
> wp		: yes
> flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat  
> pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> bogomips	: 1445.88
>
> What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?

Yep, I think so.
> Can this be  
> combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.

Probably. If it works, go with it.
> Or possibly we can condense them into a model_6xxm (that's an m on the  
> end for mobile)??

Sorry, too lazy to restart the reply. That doesn't seem like a great
idea, seems like it could have bad repercussions with p4s that use
0x06xx model numbers, if they aren't compatible. Also the 69x are
non-mobile cpus.

-Corey

Quoting Corey Osgood :
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
> >
> > processor	: 0
> > vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> > cpu family	: 6
> > model		: 11
> > model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> > stepping	: 4
> > cpu MHz		: 731.076
> > cache size	: 256 KB
> > fdiv_bug	: no
> > hlt_bug		: no
> > f00f_bug	: no
> > coma_bug	: no
> > fpu		: yes
> > fpu_exception	: yes
> > cpuid level	: 2
> > wp		: yes
> > flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
> > pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > bogomips	: 1445.88
> >
> > What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
>
> Yep, I think so.
> > Can this be
> > combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.
>
> Probably. If it works, go with it.
> > Or possibly we can condense them into a model_6xxm (that's an m on the
> > end for mobile)??
>
> Sorry, too lazy to restart the reply. That doesn't seem like a great
> idea, seems like it could have bad repercussions with p4s that use
> 0x06xx model numbers, if they aren't compatible. Also the 69x are
> non-mobile cpus.
>
> -Corey

Are you sure? Looks like the only CPU that calls the model_69x and  
model_6dx is from the socket_mPGA479M. I'm assuming the "M" on the end  
is for "Mobile", also considering the processors mentioned are:

From model_6dx_init.c
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06D6 }, /* Pentium M on 90nm with 2MiB of L2 cache */

From model_69x_init.c
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x0695 }, /* Pentium M */

It just seems a little silly to setup a whole new directory of exactly  
the same code as these. Except mine would say:

model_6bx_init.c
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06B4 }, /* Mobile Celeron FCBGA 479*/

Corey, you should be able to relate with all your i82801xx code  
condensing. Good work by the way (if I hadden't mentioned that  
already):-)

Thanks - Joe

[Corey Osgood]

[e-mail] wrote:
> Quoting Corey Osgood :
> > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
> > >
> > > processor    : 0
> > > vendor_id    : GenuineIntel
> > > cpu family    : 6
> > > model        : 11
> > > model name    : Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> > > stepping    : 4
> > > cpu MHz        : 731.076
> > > cache size    : 256 KB
> > > fdiv_bug    : no
> > > hlt_bug        : no
> > > f00f_bug    : no
> > > coma_bug    : no
> > > fpu        : yes
> > > fpu_exception    : yes
> > > cpuid level    : 2
> > > wp        : yes
> > > flags        : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca
> > > cmov pat
> > > pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > > bogomips    : 1445.88
> > >
> > > What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
> >
> > Yep, I think so.
> > > Can this be
> > > combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.
> >
> > Probably. If it works, go with it.
> > > Or possibly we can condense them into a model_6xxm (that's an m on the
> > > end for mobile)??
> >
> > Sorry, too lazy to restart the reply. That doesn't seem like a great
> > idea, seems like it could have bad repercussions with p4s that use
> > 0x06xx model numbers, if they aren't compatible. Also the 69x are
> > non-mobile cpus.
> >
> > -Corey
>
> Are you sure? Looks like the only CPU that calls the model_69x and
> model_6dx is from the socket_mPGA479M. I'm assuming the "M" on the end
> is for "Mobile", also considering the processors mentioned are:
>
> From model_6dx_init.c
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06D6 }, /* Pentium M on 90nm with 2MiB of L2
> cache */
>
> From model_69x_init.c
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x0695 }, /* Pentium M */
>
> It just seems a little silly to setup a whole new directory of exactly
> the same code as these. Except mine would say:
>
> model_6bx_init.c
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06B4 }, /* Mobile Celeron FCBGA 479*/
>
> Corey, you should be able to relate with all your i82801xx code
> condensing. Good work by the way (if I hadden't mentioned that
> already):-)
>
> Thanks - Joe

Gar, you caught me off guard, I was working from memory and I shouldn't
be. You're right, of course, but please don't use the 69x, use 6xx
instead. The 69x appears to be exactly the same as 6xx and 6dx, except
that the 6xx has the microcode updates.

-Corey

Quoting Corey Osgood :
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > Quoting Corey Osgood :
> > > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > > Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
> > > >
> > > > processor    : 0
> > > > vendor_id    : GenuineIntel
> > > > cpu family    : 6
> > > > model        : 11
> > > > model name    : Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> > > > stepping    : 4
> > > > cpu MHz        : 731.076
> > > > cache size    : 256 KB
> > > > fdiv_bug    : no
> > > > hlt_bug        : no
> > > > f00f_bug    : no
> > > > coma_bug    : no
> > > > fpu        : yes
> > > > fpu_exception    : yes
> > > > cpuid level    : 2
> > > > wp        : yes
> > > > flags        : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca
> > > > cmov pat
> > > > pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > > > bogomips    : 1445.88
> > > >
> > > > What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
> > >
> > > Yep, I think so.
> > > > Can this be
> > > > combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.
> > >
> > > Probably. If it works, go with it.
> > > > Or possibly we can condense them into a model_6xxm (that's an m on the
> > > > end for mobile)??
> > >
> > > Sorry, too lazy to restart the reply. That doesn't seem like a great
> > > idea, seems like it could have bad repercussions with p4s that use
> > > 0x06xx model numbers, if they aren't compatible. Also the 69x are
> > > non-mobile cpus.
> > >
> > > -Corey
> >
> > Are you sure? Looks like the only CPU that calls the model_69x and
> > model_6dx is from the socket_mPGA479M. I'm assuming the "M" on the end
> > is for "Mobile", also considering the processors mentioned are:
> >
> > From model_6dx_init.c
> > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06D6 }, /* Pentium M on 90nm with 2MiB of L2
> > cache */
> >
> > From model_69x_init.c
> > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x0695 }, /* Pentium M */
> >
> > It just seems a little silly to setup a whole new directory of exactly
> > the same code as these. Except mine would say:
> >
> > model_6bx_init.c
> > { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06B4 }, /* Mobile Celeron FCBGA 479*/
> >
> > Corey, you should be able to relate with all your i82801xx code
> > condensing. Good work by the way (if I hadden't mentioned that
> > already):-)
> >
> > Thanks - Joe
>
> Gar, you caught me off guard, I was working from memory and I shouldn't
> be. You're right, of course, but please don't use the 69x, use 6xx
> instead. The 69x appears to be exactly the same as 6xx and 6dx, except
> that the 6xx has the microcode updates.
>
> -Corey

Your right microcode updates are better. I will submit a patch with:
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06B4 }, /* Mobile Celeron FCBGA 479*/
when I get a chance. Thanks for you help.

Thanks - Joe

[LinuxBIOS] [v2][patch] Mobile Intel Celeron CPU Support

This patch adds support for the Mobile Intel Celeron CPU (Micro-FC-BGA)

Signed-off-by: Joseph Smith

Thanks - Joe

[LinuxBIOS] [v2][patch] Mobile Intel Celeron CPU Support

[Corey Osgood]

[e-mail] wrote:
> This patch adds support for the Mobile Intel Celeron CPU (Micro-FC-BGA)
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Smith
>
> Thanks - Joe

Acked-by: Corey Osgood

[LinuxBIOS] [v2][patch] Mobile Intel Celeron CPU Support

Quoting Corey Osgood :
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > This patch adds support for the Mobile Intel Celeron CPU (Micro-FC-BGA)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joseph Smith
> >
> > Thanks - Joe
>
> Acked-by: Corey Osgood

Will someone commit this please?

Thanks - Joe

[LinuxBIOS] [v2][PATCH] Mobile Intel Celeron CPU Support

Quoting [e-mail]:
> Quoting Corey Osgood :
> > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for the Mobile Intel Celeron CPU (Micro-FC-BGA)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joseph Smith
> > >
> > > Thanks - Joe
> >
> > Acked-by: Corey Osgood

Will someone commit this please?

Thanks - Joe

[LinuxBIOS] [v2][PATCH] Mobile Intel Celeron CPU Support

[Stefan Reinauer]

* [e-mail]  [071015 23:47]:
> Will someone commit this please?

r2856

[Uwe Hermann]

On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:56:04PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
> >
> > processor	: 0
> > vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> > cpu family	: 6
> > model		: 11
> > model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> > stepping	: 4
> > cpu MHz		: 731.076
> > cache size	: 256 KB
> > fdiv_bug	: no
> > hlt_bug		: no
> > f00f_bug	: no
> > coma_bug	: no
> > fpu		: yes
> > fpu_exception	: yes
> > cpuid level	: 2
> > wp		: yes
> > flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat  
> > pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > bogomips	: 1445.88
> >
> > What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
>
> Yep, I think so.

You could also run 'cpuid -a' or 'x86info -a' for lots more
information...

apt-get install cpuid
apt-get install x86info

Uwe.

Quoting Uwe Hermann :
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:56:04PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
> > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
> > >
> > > processor	: 0
> > > vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> > > cpu family	: 6
> > > model		: 11
> > > model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> > > stepping	: 4
> > > cpu MHz		: 731.076
> > > cache size	: 256 KB
> > > fdiv_bug	: no
> > > hlt_bug		: no
> > > f00f_bug	: no
> > > coma_bug	: no
> > > fpu		: yes
> > > fpu_exception	: yes
> > > cpuid level	: 2
> > > wp		: yes
> > > flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
> > > pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > > bogomips	: 1445.88
> > >
> > > What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
> >
> > Yep, I think so.
>
> You could also run 'cpuid -a' or 'x86info -a' for lots more
> information...
>
> apt-get install cpuid
> apt-get install x86info
>
> Uwe.

Ok, I will try that before someone acks my patch. I was just going by  
the datasheet:

Reserved [31:14] - 0x0000
Type [13:12] - 0x0000
Family[11:8] - 0x0600
Model [7:4] - 0x00B0
Stepping [3:0] 0x0004

= 0x06B4

Thanks - Joe

Quoting [e-mail]:
> Quoting Uwe Hermann :
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:56:04PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
> > > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > > Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
> > > >
> > > > processor	: 0
> > > > vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> > > > cpu family	: 6
> > > > model		: 11
> > > > model name	: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU          733MHz
> > > > stepping	: 4
> > > > cpu MHz		: 731.076
> > > > cache size	: 256 KB
> > > > fdiv_bug	: no
> > > > hlt_bug		: no
> > > > f00f_bug	: no
> > > > coma_bug	: no
> > > > fpu		: yes
> > > > fpu_exception	: yes
> > > > cpuid level	: 2
> > > > wp		: yes
> > > > flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
> > > > pse36 mmx fxsr sse
> > > > bogomips	: 1445.88
> > > >
> > > > What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
> > >
> > > Yep, I think so.
> >
> > You could also run 'cpuid -a' or 'x86info -a' for lots more
> > information...
> >
> > apt-get install cpuid
> > apt-get install x86info
> >
> > Uwe.
>
> Ok, I will try that before someone acks my patch. I was just going by
> the datasheet:
>
> Reserved [31:14] - 0x0000
> Type [13:12] - 0x0000
> Family[11:8] - 0x0600
> Model [7:4] - 0x00B0
> Stepping [3:0] 0x0004
>
> = 0x06B4

Ok, I specifically found in the datasheet where it is a 0x06B4. Please  
ack and commit the patch.

Thanks - Joe