So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we get names like CORE BOOT CBFS
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot < email@example.com> wrote:
2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury firstname.lastname@example.org:
It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer needs to be shared through ACPI).
One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in newer kernel versions.
-- coreboot mailing list: email@example.com https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot