So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we get names like
CORE
BOOT
CBFS

?

ron

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot <coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote:
2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>:
> It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all
> information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer
> needs to be shared through ACPI).
One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux
exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in
newer kernel versions.


Patrick

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot