Re: [coreboot] r1065 - in coreboot-v3: arch/x86 mainboard/kontron mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m

[Peter Stuge]

[e-mail] wrote:
> $(Q)cd $(obj) && ./util/lar/lar -e $(COMPRESSFLAG) -a $(obj)/coreboot.rom $(SMM):normal/smm;

normal/smm vs. blob/vsa - should one of them be changed?

//Peter

r1065 - in coreboot-v3: arch/x86 mainboard/kontron mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 06.12.2008 22:54, Peter Stuge wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > $(Q)cd $(obj) && ./util/lar/lar -e $(COMPRESSFLAG) -a $(obj)/coreboot.rom $(SMM):normal/smm;
>
> normal/smm vs. blob/vsa - should one of them be changed?

Good question. What about normal/vsa?

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

r1065 - in coreboot-v3: arch/x86 mainboard/kontron mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m

[ron minnich]

On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Peter Stuge  wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > $(Q)cd $(obj) && ./util/lar/lar -e $(COMPRESSFLAG) -a $(obj)/coreboot.rom $(SMM):normal/smm;
>
> normal/smm vs. blob/vsa - should one of them be changed?

Well my propoosal for blob/smm was rejected :-)

and normal/smm seems pretty safe.

one thing about blob/vsa -- there is unlikely to be a normal/vsa and
fallback/vsa. vsa is unlikely to have a normal and fallback version --
it's a blob.

I think I'm ok with this for now.

ron