Dear Gerd, dear Greg,
sorry for the late reply.
Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2015, 11:31 -0400 schrieb Gregg Levine:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com wrote:
On Di, 2015-04-21 at 02:24 -0500, Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand wrote:
The QEMU x86_64 Q35 fails verification as of commit 7ab46f8085146db57699001462da871f2e4d9965
Log says at the end "RAPTOR ENGINEERING AUTOMATED TEST BOOT SUCCESS"
Can you fix your test case and stop spamming the list please?
Please contact Timothy Pearson at Raptor Engineering tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com regarding any issues stemming from this notification
[x] done.
Hello! My thoughts exactly. Thank you sir.
I suspect somehow it was supposed to be internal to hs outfit only. And something changed with regards to the logic behind how those annoying e-mail messages being sent to us.
As for the test cases, they are extremely confusing to me. How many of us also were?
The confusion could be solved in the mean time, but I still want to reply.
After reading both of your replies to the test stand message, I was very angry and disappointed about the bad assumptions you both made and the, in my opinion, impolite style by using words like *spamming* and *annoying*.
For the future I wish that we first assume that the other side is meaning well. So I should assume, both of you meant well too. But I just wanted to get it out.
In the end, in my opinion, the Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand¹ is the best contribution to the coreboot infrastructure since the switching to a git based workflow. So big thanks to Raptor Engineering and Timothy!
Thanks,
Paul
¹ REATS is a strange acronym. Maybe a better name can be found. ;-)