On 06/14/2018 08:41 PM, Martin Roth wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:35 PM Leah Rowe info@gluglug.org.uk wrote:
On 14/06/18 19:01, Martin Roth wrote:
- The wiki requires a separate login from everything else, which
has to be created manually.
Not only that, but it wasn't clear how to get an account in the first place>
I guess I didn't realize that it was a problem. If you clicked 'log in' in the top of the wiki, it told you who to email along with their addresses.
Yeah it was quite clear to me how to get an account when I first wanted to contribute and it only took a few days to get approved despite the fact that I am certainly not a member of the coreboot elite xD
"If you don't have an account and wish to contribute contact Stefan Reinauer or Patrick Georgi and tell them what exactly you want to contribute." https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111952/http://www.coreboot.org:80/index....
I must say that Mr. georgi was quite welcoming in granting me an account as a new user - and I have repaid that with a many helpful edits and created pages.
By the way, what do you think of the idea I floated in a previous message? My idea is to have some kind of web interface where a non-technical user who doesn't know how to use git can browse the documentation on the website and click "edit", which will take them to the appropriate markdown file in the repository. When they're done, they give their edit a title and description, which becomes the commit message, and their contribution gets sent to code review (Gerrit).
How feasible do you think this would be? It would give some of the ease of use of MediaWiki as before, while still having all of the advantages that you listed.
I have no issue with that if someone wanted to work on it. It might still cause some difficulties because those people probably wouldn't be able to respond to requests for updates in gerrit
An email could be automatically sent to them for that, and then replying to it could automatically create a reply on gerrit.
and they wouldn't necessarily follow the rest of the rules we have for submitting to coreboot, but maybe those issues could be worked out. Maybe a documentation administrator could shepherd the patches the rest of the way through the process.> As far as feasibility, I'm sure it could be done, it would just take someone committed to making it happen.
This would be quite nice in terms of usability and I very much hope someone makes it.
Also can someone answer: I presume that editing the wiki it requires my "real" name as it is on git?