Please try another switch
In southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_pci.c
Line dword |= (1<<27) /* discard Timer */ ===> dword &= ~(1<<27);
YH
-----Original Message----- From: linuxbios-bounces@linuxbios.org [mailto:linuxbios-bounces@linuxbios.org] On Behalf Of Ward Vandewege Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:15 AM To: Alan Mimms Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org; Lu, Yinghai Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_LB_MEM_TOPK (and a patch)
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:00:28PM -0700, Alan Mimms wrote:
The code should be setting the 1<<4 bit (so as to clear one of the
error
bits) instead of 1<<6 (the read only bit that signals end of HT bus chain).
After making this change, your board won't hang when the BIOS or Linux detects a need to reboot due to some fatal error.
This is a pretty trivial change to an error case that hardly ever
occurs
but was crucial for us. I claim this change is safe and correct and should be merged into the main line code.
Yes, please merge that change!
Our box now keeps rebooting itself instead of crashing - have a look at the attached boot log. Maybe this will be more of a clue as to what exactly is happening? Anyone got anymore ideas?
Thanks, Alan!! Ward.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:01:03AM -0700, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
Please try another switch
In southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_pci.c
Line dword |= (1<<27) /* discard Timer */ ===> dword &= ~(1<<27);
Yinghai, you're a hero! The box has been up for 1 hour and 45 minutes. I think the problem is solved. I'll do more stress testing, but it really looks like this patch should go into the mainline linuxbios tree.
Thanks! Ward.
* Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org [060410 20:23]:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:01:03AM -0700, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
Please try another switch
In southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_pci.c
Line dword |= (1<<27) /* discard Timer */ ===> dword &= ~(1<<27);
Yinghai, you're a hero! The box has been up for 1 hour and 45 minutes. I think the problem is solved. I'll do more stress testing, but it really looks like this patch should go into the mainline linuxbios tree.
Is this with both changes from this thread applied?
Stefan
Not yet.
On 4/11/06, Stefan Reinauer stepan@openbios.org wrote:
- Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org [060410 20:23]:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:01:03AM -0700, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
Please try another switch
In southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_pci.c
Line dword |= (1<<27) /* discard Timer */ ===> dword &= ~(1<<27);
Yinghai, you're a hero! The box has been up for 1 hour and 45 minutes. I think the problem is solved. I'll do more stress testing, but it really looks like this patch should go into the mainline linuxbios tree.
Is this with both changes from this thread applied?
Stefan
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org [060410 20:23]:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:01:03AM -0700, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
Please try another switch
In southbridge/amd/amd8111/amd8111_pci.c
Line dword |= (1<<27) /* discard Timer */ ===> dword &= ~(1<<27);
Yinghai, you're a hero! The box has been up for 1 hour and 45 minutes. I think the problem is solved. I'll do more stress testing, but it really looks like this patch should go into the mainline linuxbios tree.
Is this with both changes from this thread applied?
All three in fact - to my local tree. But the first one (small fix from YH on Friday) has already been applied in the svn tree I see.
Ward.
* Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org [060411 13:37]:
All three in fact - to my local tree. But the first one (small fix from YH on Friday) has already been applied in the svn tree I see.
Ward.
Ok, committed in revision 2251. Could you please update to this version and verify it's working correctly?
Stefan
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:38:06PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org [060411 13:37]:
All three in fact - to my local tree. But the first one (small fix from YH on Friday) has already been applied in the svn tree I see.
Ward.
Ok, committed in revision 2251. Could you please update to this version and verify it's working correctly?
I've checked out a clean 2254 tree. Compiled & installed, works great still.
Thanks, Ward.