Thank you all for your help. The demo is tomorrow and i couldn't get it running. Tried everything but coreboot_ram.o wouldn't link.
To your suggestions:
- To measure direct in the payload is not really acceptable, cause you have to change every payload and for my concept you have to measure every possible payload which could come - Another library with SHA-2 family is hard too find and I can't use any untrusted or unmaintained code in my thesis, but thanks for that.
Hopefully in future, it will be easier to link foreign packages in Coreboot.
Regards,
René
2009/7/27 ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Reinauerstepan@coresystems.de wrote:
On 7/27/09 5:22 PM, ron minnich wrote:
This is interesting, it's the second note today speculating that we need to compile with -lgcc.
Which is especially weird since we link against libgcc already.
ow. I have not been paying attention again. I thought we did the nostdlibs thing. Sorry.
Yes, we should drop libgcc linking, but x86emu wants it for the 64bit division, too..
oops. Missed that. ron