Thank you all for your help. The demo is tomorrow and i couldn't get it running. Tried everything but coreboot_ram.o wouldn't link.

To your suggestions:

     - To measure direct in the payload is not really acceptable, cause you have to change every payload and for my concept you have to measure every possible payload which could come
     - Another library with SHA-2 family is hard too find and I can't use any untrusted or unmaintained code in my thesis, but thanks for that.

Hopefully in future, it will be easier to link foreign packages in Coreboot.

Regards,

René

2009/7/27 ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Reinauer<stepan@coresystems.de> wrote:
> On 7/27/09 5:22 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>> This is interesting, it's the second note today speculating that we
>> need to compile with -lgcc.
>>
>
> Which is especially weird since we link against libgcc already.

ow. I have not been paying attention again. I thought we did the
nostdlibs thing. Sorry.

> Yes, we should drop libgcc linking, but x86emu wants it for the 64bit
> division, too..

oops. Missed that.
ron