Re: [coreboot] Why do we have FSP-S

[Duncan]

Hello Zoran,

Zoran Stojsavljevic:
> > Our recommendation for some time has been a mix -- arm64 client devices
> > (laptops, tablets, etc.) and ppc64el servers.  With those two, you can
> > replace x86 entirely if you don't have proprietary software in your
> > environment.
>
> With all due respect, this is the discussion about Coreboot going into
> The Right Direction! This is what I actually aimed for. :-)

Please clarify what "The Right Direction" is. You have confused me, as I
thought the thread was about 'Why do we have FSP-S'.