On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
Not really. I guess I couldn't tell from Carl-Daniel's request what exactly he wanted. I thought this would be enough to let him make something work. I admit it was quick and dirty. It could be easily changed to take a path instead of a string.
Since you are up to speed on the config tool, and know how to improve it :-), I'd like to request a general purpose include command instead (or see if there is already one in there I forgot about :-)
Then, once you have that, carl-daniel can figure out where he wants this include file, and then we are done!
Thanks
ron