Myles,
When you build the broken one: 1) Is it a real exec file? Or is the file like 496 bytes? What does file busybox report? 2) What version of uclibc was the FC5 system using? 3) can you do a make in the busybox directory outside of buildrom in work/busybox/busybox-a.b.c/ and look at the output from this, i.e. is the busybox file have a correct size and is dynamic linked, etc..
Marc
********************* Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:marc.karasek@sun.com ph:770.360.6415 *********************
Myles Watson wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:22 PM To: Myles Watson Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] SimNOW V2 LAB problem
Crap, another compiler/tools problem. I hate these.. what version of gcc/binutils did you use under FC5?
gcc 4.1.1 for x86_64 release 51.fc5 binutils 2.16.91.0.6 for x86_64 release 5
I wouldn't have upgraded, but I couldn't build a working version of qemu with those tools. Now I have two broken systems :(
Thanks, Myles