On Saturday, February 08, 2014 05:30:38 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
If the project could change to work somehow differently and that would help contributors then I think that's something we should consider identifying and doing.
Allow git merging. Forced cherry-picking is a PITA for almost everybody.
The patches would still go through the same review process, but once the branch is go, the entire branch gets merged at once.
Objections?
It's a natural consequence of the fact that companies can't always immediately push all their work upstream.
What's the difference from Linux kernel development again?
See @above.
Alex