27 Apr
2009
27 Apr
'09
9:32 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk, CBFS, Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's got some really great advantages, but noone seems to care about finishing it.
-Corey