31 May
2009
31 May
'09
10:34 p.m.
I think the original is ambiguous and the suggested change is incorrect. Hopefully correct code follows:
if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar) & (1 << 26))))
The code tries to test if a given bit is not set.
Sorry, I failed to understand that (was wondering of that code...). Now i'm mystified of how the sign-off/ack procedure works when you fixed the only change in my patch ... Who should make the new patch + sign off?
--
urjaman