Stefan Reinauer wrote:
NACK
NAK +1.
I don't think this should be user visible. In fact I think it should be dropped from all boards once they are working.
I agree with this.
The test is bogus and only capable of finding crude coding errors. So either you're a developer and know how to put the code there, or you shouldn't know about it.
It's also not very nice to have a library function be conditionally empty depending on configuration. I think it would be better to move towards fewer lines of code in cache_as_ram_auto.c, not more.
//Peter