On 02.05.2018 18:06, Piotr Król wrote:
On 04/28/2018 03:48 PM, Nico Huber wrote:
On 28.04.2018 15:16, Piotr Król wrote:
Second thing that IMO is problematic in board status is assumption that system have to boot with vanilla coreboot. This is problematic when you have to use customized version of SeaBIOS or any other payload used for booting system.
The payload doesn't matter. Only thing we'd care about is the coreboot revision that should be vanilla. Actually board status currently accepts any revision and rules weren't discussed, yet (another point why I don't think anything will happen because of missing board-status uploads).
If your payload version/repository is different you have to modify Makefile to build bootable coreboot.rom then you will get dirty tree.
I don't see that. You can always build your payload separately and add it with CONFIG_PAYLOAD_ELF.
If policy was not discussed, then I do not understand hype related to boards removal.
What I tried to say more subtly earlier, the hype is pure bullshit.
Nico