Re: [LinuxBIOS] flashrom, uniflash.

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> And then there's /dev/bios. It supports quite a lot of hardware 
> and it talks to the hardware in a smarter way than most flash drivers 
> in "flashrom". This is why I still get regular mails for the driver.
>
> But it should be all integrated in flashrom, its architecture is a lot
> more sane.

Oh. I had assumed flashrom was the successor of /dev/bios and other
flashing tools. Porting the code from /dev/bios to flashrom will
probably be a lot easier than trying to find out what uniflash does.

Stefan, do you have any plans in that direction?

Regards,
Carl-Daniel