ron minnich wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a few more questions that I could probably figure out answers to by testing, but hopefully it's easier just to ask:
- If a device is defined in the dts, but disabled during
phase4_enable_disable which renders the device hidden, what will/should v3 do?
the device should end up not even being found. marc felt that phase4_enable_disable was ill-defined and we are working on making this clearer.
It will not be enabled or given resources because the device was not found. The scan code scans the hardware and then matches against the device tree to get the correct enable and resource allocation functions. In the dts it will not have dev->enabled set. (at least that is how I think it goes....)
Marc