Hi,
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:19:22PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Yes. GPL v2, like the rest of LinuxBIOS.
OK, here's an updated version. When was romcc started? I used "Copyright 2003-2006 Eric W. Biederman", taking the numbers from the svn logs... Is that correct?
Not all of LinuxBIOS is currently marked as "GPL v2", though. There are many files which say "GPL v2 or later" (see previous license thread)...
What are people here thinking about GPL versions? Do you explicitly want LinuxBIOS to be GPL v2? If so, why? I personally usually use "GPL v2 or later", which will prevent hassle when GPL v3 will be here (and judging from what I've read about GPL v3, that'll be fine with me, too).
I guess it is considered "stable" for what it does. Want to take it over? ;-)
Um, no thanks :) That's way too complex for me to understand anyways...
Odd. I know a few of tests are expected to fail that way, but I thought I had them marked. I would have to look into it in more detail to give a better answer.
I'm using gcc 4.1.2 if that matters.
I was thinking about maybe making romcc more quiet, currently it's spitting out tons of compile warnings such as:
romcc.c:17732: warning: 'print_live_variables' defined but not used
Uwe.