Re: [coreboot] [Patch] CMOS: Add set_option and rework get_option.

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 29.05.2009 16:14 Uhr, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> Currently, our security of the cmos value being correct with respect to 
> the options table, is the existence of the option name string in the 
> optionstable, and the validity of the checksum. We need more than this, 
> we need a better way of matching cmos data with the options table.

Why?