Don't know if anyone brought this up yet, but the FOSS communities that I know uses jitsi: https://meet.jit.si
It's MIT, but works very well.
Em sex, 17 de mar de 2017 às 11:27, tturne@codeaurora.org escreveu:
On 2017-03-17 06:27, Peter Stuge wrote:
Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote:
2017-03-17 13:17 GMT+01:00 Dumitru Ursu dima@ceata.org:
I never tried the web interface.
We did, it failed us.
I wish someone would have mentioned that sooner.
What problems did people have with mumble-web, and where was the websockets server running, relative to the mumble server?
//Peter
I'm sorry, I have to contribute at this point.
I got started with OSS in 2000 when Monta Vista Software (anybody remember HardHat Linux?) hired me as a FAE. I was teamed with a salesperson and we were trying to close business selling an embedded Linux distribution. Every 6 months or so we would have a sales meeting somewhere and engineering would share with us the latest product development news, etc.
Ahead of one of these meetings I happened to be in headquarters (Santa Clara, CA) and remember very clearly the happy face of this engineering manager who had just "wasted" (my opinion) 3-5 days generating a presentation slide-deck with OSS (I don't even know if Open Office was available at that time) for the meeting, instead of spending two hours doing same presentation with Powerpoint.
Just because I work with OSS doesn't automatically make me a zealot for OSS as the only way to go. I choose the correct tool to get the job done. I always hope for an OSS option, but to this day, Outlook is the only product Micro$oft got right and I will choose it over any of the OSS options I have tried as an email client.
I will leave with, think of the contribution to Coreboot source code this energy could generate instead of spending it on fixing a problem that doesn't need fixing? Cheers, T.mike
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot