ron minnich wrote:
Besides that, I agree with Peter on naming when he wrote:
It absolutely must get a different name. Several file systems exist in Linux already with names that are similar enough to cause a lot of unneccessary confusion.
I welcome another name, but I won't accept a reject unless it comes with another name :-)
Some -fs names I would like much better: cfs compfs componentfs fwfs firmwarefs cbfs corbfs topfs
I want to avoid anything with RAM, ROM, BIOS, boot or flash because those terms are extremely overloaded.
//Peter