weird. gcc 3.3.5 from SUSE 9.3 and gcc 4.0.2 from SUSE 10 work fine. You should definitely avoid using gcc 2.96 when possible.
Unfortanetly, with gcc 2.96 I'm not able to compile the LB image itself :D
Furthermore, I work on a selfmade minimal distro, but I will try to compile a working gcc version to compile both, flashtool and the image without any warnings
Currently I'm wondering about the differences in gcc. For flashtool I get warnings for comparisons between signed and unsigned only, without the -Werror Flag and the gcc 3.3 version. Why isn't gcc backwards compatible?
Now I have the tool compiled with gcc 2.96 and it works, but compiling the image with gcc 3.3 results in the same warnings and a few warnings more. It could be, that the image won't work :(
However, I will test the results the next days and stay tuned :D
regards chris
@Stefan
I think i can mail to in german, is it so ??