I was excited to discover this project; it looks like good work. I did have a few comments / questions:
On the list of benefits on the front page it says: "Avoids the need for a slow, buggy, proprietary BIOS." I would add to this that it gives the end user freedom from invisible functionality black holes. For example, my laptop BIOS will on only initiate suspend-to-disk on timeout; there is no way for me to invoke it on demand (and there is no way for me to update the existing BIOS to add the needed functionality unless I can reverse engineer the BIOS at great risk to my system). With LinuxBIOS presumably I would have some recourse.
I am surprised that the list of payloads is not comprehensive; ie. apparently Linux BIOS doesn't provide a straight boot from MBR. This confused me. If this is not a goal, I would suggest making it a goal. This reflects my own philosophy that end-user interests are best served by compatibility.
I would also suggest a feature list on the webpage, so that passers-by like me can see at a glance if you intend to support things like suspend-to-disk (since the trend is to move s4 functionality to the OS).
Best regards, Chris
_________________________________________________________________ Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win? http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://dav...