On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:07 PM Michal Zygowski michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com wrote:
On 10.11.2019 17:13, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 12:35 PM Mike Banon mikebdp2@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, I've sent the reports for Lenovo G505S (AMD Fam15h) and ASUS AM1I-A (AMD Fam16h). Hope this helps, especially AM1I-A since its' previous report was from early 2018.
I do not plan to volunteer for C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK=y conversion for AGESA/PI platforms, so it is currently uncertain if some or any of them will remain on master branch after 4.11 release.
I will soon update my patches with C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK for binaryPI which will be rebased on top of postcar patches (easier for CAR teardown).
Kyösti I would appreciate if you could look at https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32363 Nobody tells you to volunteer, but review very welcome, since nobody seems to be interested to even take look at it.
At the moment there is too much bad blood for me to touch anything remotely related to AGESA, you have seen some of the private email exchange. And most notably, the lack of response.
Looks like when AMD is not stabbing you in the back, they are shooting themselves in the leg instead.
Kyösti