Is the xcompile util a V3 only util? I did not see it in the V2 tree.
If this is so, then it will not help us, unless we add it to V2 as V3 compiles fine, the only broken build currently is the V2 build.
/********************* Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:marc.karasek@sun.com ph:770.360.6415 *********************/
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Uwe Hermann schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:43:57PM -0500, Marc Karasek wrote:
Here it is in -u format...
Thanks, but I think your Thunderbird broke the patch, probably because you copy-pasted it into the mailer and it clipped long lines.
I recommend to use 'svn diff > foo.patch' in your svn tree (easier IMO, and that already produces patches in the -u format) and then just attach that file to the mail.
================================================================= diff -r -u -x .svn LinuxBIOSv2.orig/src/arch/i386/Config.lb LinuxBIOSv2/src/arch/i386/Config.lb --- LinuxBIOSv2.orig/src/arch/i386/Config.lb 2007-12-06 10:06:31.000000000 -0500 +++ LinuxBIOSv2/src/arch/i386/Config.lb 2007-12-04 16:25:13.000000000 -0500 @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
makerule linuxbios depends "crt0.o init.o $(LINUXBIOS_APC) $(LINUXBIOS_RAM_ROM) ldscript.ld"
- action "$(CC) -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o $@ -T ldscript.ld
crt0.o init.o"
- action "$(CC) -Wl,--build-id=none -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static
-o
We should make sure this doesn't break any other distros / compiler versions. Do all reasonably new gcc/ld versions know about '--build-id'?
that's why we started using util/xcompile.