On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Marc Karasek Marc.Karasek@sun.com wrote:
Myles,
When you build the broken one:
- Is it a real exec file? Or is the file like 496 bytes? What does file
busybox report?
initrd-rootfs/bin/busybox is about 200K
Did you mean a different file? I think the error would come sooner if busybox were linked incorrectly.
- What version of uclibc was the FC5 system using?
The same as the FC6. 9.29. I bumped it up for SimNow because 9.28 didn't have a file necessary for x86_64.
- can you do a make in the busybox directory outside of buildrom in
work/busybox/busybox-a.b.c/ and look at the output from this, i.e. is the busybox file have a correct size and is dynamic linked, etc..
I don't think I have that problem. Maybe you're talking about a different file?
Myles
Marc
Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:marc.karasek@sun.com ph:770.360.6415
Myles Watson wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:22 PM To: Myles Watson Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] SimNOW V2 LAB problem
Crap, another compiler/tools problem. I hate these.. what version of gcc/binutils did you use under FC5?
gcc 4.1.1 for x86_64 release 51.fc5 binutils 2.16.91.0.6 for x86_64 release 5
I wouldn't have upgraded, but I couldn't build a working version of qemu with those tools. Now I have two broken systems :(
Thanks, Myles