Stefan Reinauer stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org writes:
--- a/src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c +++ b/src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c @@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static void southbridge_smi_apmc(unsigned int node, smm_state_save_area_t *state /* Emulate B2 register as the FADT / Linux expects it */
reg8 = inb(APM_CNT);
- if (mainboard_apm_cnt&& mainboard_apm_cnt(reg8))
return;
Is it on purpose that the mainboard_apm_cnt function can prevent the generic 82801gx code (including the not implemented C state coordination) from running?
Yes, that's intentional. If one mainboard doesn't like the way how the i82801gx handles some APM_CNT, it could say so and does it's own implementation. Most callbacks will probably simply return 0, but's IMHO it's nice to have this option.
Sven