This is pretty off topic, but...
<clipped from http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/FAQ.html#unshrink > (this applies to the unzip that ships with most linux distributions)
"Why does UnZip say "`shrink' method not supported"?
The `shrink' compression method is encumbered by a patent. Although it appears that stand-alone unshrinking is not covered, the owner has claimed otherwise in public statements, and the matter has never been tested in court. (For what it's worth, the same algorithm is used in other utilities that have been included in every Linux and FreeBSD distribution that has ever shipped or been downloaded, and no one has ever complained about that. So the public statements may simply be the usual legal posturing. On the other hand, Info-ZIP has no particular desire to become the test case.)
Thus, by default, unshrinking is not enabled in newer releases of Info-ZIP's distributed binaries. Those who wish to download older binaries or compile their own versions may still do so. See UnZip's COPYING and INSTALL files for more information. "
So, yeah, I just repackaged it.
Other non-sense you speak of.
<clipped from http://www.pcengines.com/biosfaq.htm%3E "Why do you use A386 rather than MASM/NASM/TASM ? Prior versions of tinyBIOS were based on an assembler I wrote in 1987. While ridiculously fast, it did have its limitations. A386 is the closest replacement I could find, easy to get through www.eji.com, and fairly priced at $90. Please, please do not attempt to use MASM, NASM or TASM. Your time is worth more than that."
It is quite a pain to go and buy A386. But then, the man wrote it himself and its pretty hard to find a good open source bios, so I'm not going to complain. Luckily, the reason we're looking at it is really just to steal some interrupt implementations, not to try and use his bios in full. We're experiencing a bit of trouble with INT15 86 and 87 specifically, and every source helps.
- Adam Agnew
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Gregg C Levine wrote:
Hello from Gregg C Levine Adam, please define that none-sense for me. I have most of the things here, from that guy's site. My only objections are for the assembler he chose. I felt he should have used the assembler that's at the core of the binary utilities of the GNU set of tools, instead of A86. Or even Turbo Assembler from Borland, at least they understand proper licensing. Oh, and thank you for repackaging the whole material in that form. I didn't have any problems unzipping any of it here, just a darned nuisance to make it work here.
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke."� Obi-Wan Kenobi (This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi ) (This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
-----Original Message----- From: linuxbios-admin@clustermatic.org [mailto:linuxbios- admin@clustermatic.org] On Behalf Of Adam Agnew Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:27 AM To: adam@cfar.umd.edu Cc: linuxbios@clustermatic.org; rminnich@lanl.gov Subject: (no subject)
This is mostly for Adam Sulmicki for the benefit of our current
project,
but it's been about a year since it was mentioned last so I felt it wouldn't help to reiterate (i know i forgot) that there exists another open source bios, tinyBIOS
http://www.pcengines.com/tinybios.htm
and since his zip file is difficult to uncompress due to patents or
some
such non-sense, i repackaged it at http://www.missl.cs.umd.edu/~agnew/anopenbios.zip
- Adam Agnew
Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios