https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coreboot/VBT
Zoran _______
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Patrick Rudolph siro@das-labor.org wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 11:34 -0500, Matt DeVillier wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Nico Huber nico.h@gmx.de wrote:
On 05.04.2018 18:15, Matt DeVillier wrote:
my instinct is to put it in the 3rd party blobs repo, since it's
added to
the CBFS w/o modification (ie, is treated like a blob), unlike
the SPD hex
files which are selectively ordered and assembled into the
spd.bin (ie,
treated as source).
I would like to see them in 3rd party repo, as we don't process them, as Matt pointed out.
Files are concatenated, I don't see how this is treating sth. as source.
They are changed from ASCII/text to binary format, so yes it's a source file.
For the example case you sited of users building coreboot images
for
Chromebooks (eg), they still need numerous other platform/device
specific
blobs (ie, FSP), so having the vbt alone in the main repo is
really not of
any consequence.
That's very wrong. For instance I would have added Skylake+ backlight support to coreboot over a year ago if the information wasn't hidden in a secret lair. Not having information published early and conveniently accessible is always of consequence. You might just not know in what ways yet. ;)
I meant having the vbt in the main repo vs blobs repo wasn't of any consequence for building upstream coreboot images, given that other blobs are still needed. But agree that either location is better than none :)
I'd also like to see those other required blobs in the 3rd party blobs repo, but that's an entirely separate issue :)
True.
Nico
Patrick
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot