On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:25:35PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
{"Macronix", "MX29F002", MX_ID, MX_29F002, 256, 64 * 1024, TEST_UNTESTED, probe_29f002, erase_29f002, write_29f002},
{"Numonyx", "M25PE80", ST_ID, 0x8014, 1024, 256, TEST_UNTESTED, probe_spi_rdid, spi_chip_erase_c7, spi_chip_write, spi_chip_read},
Does this indent just break in the patch but look good in your file?
Thanks for noticing. It's indeed broken. I will fix it in the commit if I get an Acked.
And, did you intentionally not make a #define for the product id?
Yes, that is on purpose. I think it is a bad bad idea to define every flash chip in two different places in two different files in the tree.
With the indent fix:
Acked-by: Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se