On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:45:30AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I will try to sum it up but ... there is no way to unify it, short form. I contains very chip-dependent stuff, ranging from the simple array of longs up to a very complex multi-channel, mult-i devfn, multi-address, etc. etc. mess.
There's no good way to do it that I can see.
How does everyone feel abot unions?
I'm fine with them but a bit annoyed that they need a name. :)
Is there already a generic struct for each MC or is there just the per-type struct?
Also, can there be more than one MC on a northbridge?
Sorry if this is confusing. I'm not sure I have my head around the struct layout in v2 or v3 - but I know I want it to be a nice tree in v3.
//Peter