On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de wrote:
But finding a better name for "cache_as_ram_auto.c" is a good idea, and Ron is already working on that.
let's not do this yet. I'm trying to put together some reasonable naming and other things. Sure, we can rename cache_as_ram_auto.c but that barely touches the real problem. The file will still include .c files (yuck) and still has lots of other legacy romcc artifacts. This fix is not really getting at what really needs fixing IMHO.
I appreciate the idea but let's think about this a bit harder. Anything that introduces a new config variable is instantly suspect, in my view.
Thanks
ron