Re: pirq checking

[ron minnich]

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> the current pirq code defines intel_irq_routing_table as const, thus
> making it potentially readonly.

should be const due to execute-in-place issues.
> OTOH the code in arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c tries to correct the 
> checksum and size entries in that table.

that's my fault I bet.
> I think that table should not be declared const, especially since we
> might want to create it dynamically later on.

no, leave const unless we ALWAYS copy to memory and then work with it.

ron