On 4/2/10 6:09 PM, ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de wrote:
See patch
I'm mixed on this one, but at the same time, I bet there are few broken devices that return 0 as there were in the old days.
I wonder, what would we do with them if we knew..
Maybe we should only print the message if something else than 0xffffffff is read? Would that be more appropriate? 0xffffffff is the expected read-back if there is no device, and I think that case should not be reported as "bad id"
Like the attached one
Stefan